Topbanner
blue line
line
line
line
line
  A. New Evidence
1. The AgnEf Seminar on 29/30.05.2000 in Stockholm
 
1.2.4 The missing bow ramp rails - Page 1
 

“On each side of the bow ramp there was a permanent railing.
The railings were welded to the ramp, and as the ramp was longer than the height of the opening into the car deck, the outer part of the railings could be turned backwards inside to fit when the ramp was closed. The railings were very close to the bulkhead when the ramp was closed. Last year we discovered that the railings were missing

0029

The railing seen from outside and inside

on the video recordings from the wreck, and that there was no documentation from the JAIC that the railings had been removed during the inspection of the wreck. The JAIC states in chapter 3.3.4 that the railings were welded onto the sides of the ramp (4). This is the only information in the report regarding the ramp railings. If, assuming that the JAIC scenario is correct, the ramp had been pulled open by the visor, the railings had followed the ramp to open position. As the ramp according to the JAIC became severely damaged at this stage, let us see what would have happened with the railings.

The upper corners on the closed ramp were bent in a forward direction. On the drawing here I have illustrated what had happened to the railings if they had been on the ramp when it was damaged and fully opened.As the railings were welded to the ramp they surely had been bent outwards when the ramp was bent and damaged. The consequence would have been that they would never have fitted into the opening to the car deck when the ramp closed itself during the sinking scenario.

0030

Drawing of the ramp seen from the outside, severely bent

They should have been stuck between the ramp and the bulkhead like frog legs hanging out of the mouth of a snake.

 
arrow left sitemap arrow right